English (pdf) ||Arabic||Chinese||Français||Русский||Español||
Follow UNISPAL Twitter RSS
* A/59/50 and Corr.1. ** The present report could not be submitted by the slotted date, as it needed to include a response from a Member State which was received on 12 July 2004.
...
1. Reaffirms the right of all persons displaced as a result of the June 1967 and subsequent hostilities to return to their homes or former places of residence in the territories occupied by Israel since 1967;
2. Expresses deep concern that the mechanism agreed upon by the parties in article XII of the Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements of 1993 1 on the return of displaced persons has not been effected, and stresses the necessity for an accelerated return of displaced persons;
3. Endorses , in the meanwhile, the efforts of the Commissioner-General of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East to continue to provide humanitarian assistance, as far as practicable, on an emergency basis and as a temporary measure, to persons in the area who are currently displaced and in serious need of continuing assistance as a result of the June 1967 and subsequent hostilities;
4. Strongly appeals to all Governments and to organizations and individuals to contribute generously to the Agency and to the other intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations concerned for the above-mentioned purposes;
5. Requests the Secretary-General, after consulting with the Commissioner-General, to report to the General Assembly before its fifty-ninth session on the progress made with regard to the implementation of the present resolution.
3. In a note verbale dated 12 July 2004, the Permanent Representative of Israel replied as follows:
“Israel supports UNRWA’s humanitarian mission and recognizes its important contribution to the welfare of Palestinian refugees. We remain concerned, however, regarding a number of issues related to the politicization of UNRWA’s operations and the need to take due account of the campaign of terror being waged against Israel’s citizens. As a humanitarian agency, it is also incumbent upon UNRWA to refrain from any actions or statements concerning political questions beyond its mandate. Israel is concerned that UNRWA has failed to address the problems caused with respect to the fulfilment of its mandate by the extensive terrorist infrastructure that has taken root in Palestinian ‘refugee camps’. While Israel recognizes that UNRWA does not have a mandate to enforce security and public order, Israel urges UNRWA to draw attention to the misuse of these ‘camps’ by armed elements that violate Security Council resolutions and international law, and p “Israel supports UNRWA’s humanitarian mission and recognizes its important contribution to the welfare of Palestinian refugees. We remain concerned, however, regarding a number of issues related to the politicization of UNRWA’s operations and the need to take due account of the campaign of terror being waged against Israel’s citizens. As a humanitarian agency, it is also incumbent upon UNRWA to refrain from any actions or statements concerning political questions beyond its mandate. Israel is concerned that UNRWA has failed to address the problems caused with respect to the fulfilment of its mandate by the extensive terrorist infrastructure that has taken root in Palestinian ‘refugee camps’. While Israel recognizes that UNRWA does not have a mandate to enforce security and public order, Israel urges UNRWA to draw attention to the misuse of these ‘camps’ by armed elements that violate Security Council resolutions and international law, and pose a clear danger to the safety and security of the civilian population, and the safe fulfilment of UNRWA’s mandate.
“Israel believes that any resolution adopted with respect to UNRWA should focus on its operations, and not on extraneous political issues which are introduced to single out one country, to prejudge issues reserved by agreement for permanent status negotiations or to further the interests of one side to a conflict. There is no reason why resolutions on UNRWA, whose mission the international community supports, should be divisive and political.
“Israel supports efforts to consolidate UNRWA resolutions and remove from them extraneous political references. This goal is consistent also with general efforts aimed at the reform and revitalization of the General Assembly’s agenda. In this context, and as a result of the efforts of the resolution’s sponsors, Israel was able to vote in favour of resolution 58/95. Unfortunately, however, other UNRWA resolutions continue to be rife with irrelevant politicized rhetoric and superfluous or repetitious language. Accordingly, Israel voted against resolutions 58/91, 58/92, 58/93 and 58/94.
“Israel looks forward to continuing its cooperation and working relationship with UNRWA. Accordingly, Israel urges the Secretary-General and UNRWA to consider, together with the parties concerned, ways in which the organization can enhance the fulfilment of its mandate in an accountable and responsible manner in the best interests of those whom UNRWA has been charged to serve.”
5. In connection with paragraph 3 of General Assembly resolution 58/92, the Secretary-General refers to the report of the Commissioner-General of UNRWA for the period 1 July 2003 to 30 June 2004 2 and to the previous reports of the Commissioner-General for accounts of the continuous and ongoing assistance provided by UNRWA to persons displaced and in need of continued assistance.
Notes
1 A/48/486-S/26560, annex.
2 Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-ninth Session, Supplement No. 13 (A/59/13) (to be issued).