Question of Palestine home || Permalink || About UNISPAL || Search

Follow UNISPAL RSS Twitter

Source: Human Rights Council
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNHCHR)
19 June 2015


19 June 2015

1. What is the United Nations Independent Commission of Inquiry on the 2014 Gaza Conflict?

In July 2014 the United Nations Human Rights Council established a commission of Inquiry with a mandate:

The commissioners interpreted their mandate to include investigations of the Israeli military operation in the Gaza Strip and Israeli actions in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, as well as the activities of Palestinian armed groups in Gaza, including attacks on Israel.

The commission was initially requested to report back to the Human Rights Council in March 2015, but that was deferred to 29 June 2015 after the resignation of Professor William Schabas on 2 February 2015. [Statement on the resignation is available here: ]

On 16 September 2014, the Human Rights Council appointed three members to the commission: Justice Mary McGowan Davis (United States, current chair of the commission); Dr. Doudou Diene (Senegal); and Professor William Schabas (Canada, initial chair of the commission). Biographies of the commissioners are available here:

The relevant Human Rights Council resolution establishing the commission is S21/1 and is available here:

The commission is an independent temporary body of a non-judicial nature. It is supported by a Secretariat, established by OHCHR in accordance with standard practice.

2. Where can the findings of the commission be found?

The commission’s principal findings are summarized in the commission’s main report to the Human Rights Council (United Nations Document number: A/HRC/29/52). This is supplemented by more detailed findings, including illustrative individual cases, in the Conference Room Paper (United Nations Document number: A/HRC/29/CRP.4). The report also provides recommendations to Israel, the State of Palestine, the authorities in Gaza and Palestinian armed groups, as well as the international community. Both documents can be downloaded from the commission’s webpage:

3. What’s new about the hostilities in 2014?

The most important characteristics of the 2014 hostilities, which reflect new patterns, include:

4. Accountability

The commission notes steps taken by Israel to investigate alleged violations; however flaws remain regarding Israel’s adherence to international standards. Impunity prevails across the board for violations of international humanitarian law and human rights law allegedly committed by Israeli forces. Israel must hold wrongdoers accountable in order to ensure justice and non-recurrence.

The commission found the investigations by Palestinian authorities were woefully inadequate. No steps appear to have been taken by the local authorities in Gaza to ensure investigations into actions by Palestinian armed groups, seemingly owing to a lack of political will.

The commission called on all parties to implement credible, transparent, effective and independent accountability mechanisms and ensure the right of all victims to an effective remedy.

5. What are some of the recommendations of the commission for Israel?

The commission calls upon Israel to review its policies governing military operations and law enforcement in the context of the occupation to ensure compliance with international humanitarian law and human rights law, specifically but not exclusively with regard to:

Israel should ensure that serious international crimes, where substantiated, are met with indictments, prosecutions and convictions commensurate with the gravity of the crime and that cases are not limited to individual soldiers but encompass those in command positions in the political and military establishments, where appropriate.

Israel should address the structural issues that fuel the conflict and impede respect for human rights. In particular it should lift the blockade on Gaza and cease all settlement-related activity (see Para 86 (d) of the Report).

Israel should accede to the Rome Statute and implement the recommendations of its Turkel Report, among other steps.

6. What are some of the Recommendations of the commission for the State of Palestine?

The commission calls upon the State of Palestine to

7. What are some of the recommendations for the local authorities in Gaza and the Palestinian armed groups?

The commission calls upon the local authorities in Gaza and the Palestinian armed groups to:

8. What are some of the recommendations for the international community? 9. Have the Government of Israel, the Palestinian Authority and the authorities in Gaza cooperated with the commission?

The commission repeatedly asked Israel for its cooperation but learned only from a press release that Israel was not going to cooperate.

The commission received full cooperation from the State of Palestine, both through its Permanent Observer Mission in Geneva and from representatives who travelled to meet the commission in Amman, Jordan.

The commission spoke to members of the authorities in Gaza and received several written reports from them.

A list of questions relating to specific incidents and legal and policy issues was sent to the Government of Israel, the Government of the State of Palestine and a comparable list to Hamas. Only the State of Palestine responded to this request for information.

10. What is the basis for the findings of the commission?

In the absence of access to the Occupied Palestinian Territory and Israel, the commission obtained first hand testimony by means of Skype, VTC and telephone interviews. It also conducted face-to-face interviews with victims and witnesses from the West Bank in Jordan (November 2014 and January 2015) and with victims and witnesses from Israel in Geneva (January 2015).

The commission also reviewed satellite images, publicly available information including from official Israeli websites, documents, videos, photographs and written materials, including more than 500 submissions from various sources.

The commission was deeply moved by the immense suffering of victims subjected to repeated rounds of violence. It conducted more than 280 confidential interviews with witnesses and victims, many of whom had suffered enormous trauma.

11. What standard of proof did the commission of inquiry apply to make its findings?

In line with the practice followed by other United Nations commissions of inquiry, the commission bases its findings on a “reasonable grounds” standard of proof. It concluded that there are reasonable grounds establishing that an incident or pattern of conduct had occurred whenever it was satisfied that it had obtained a reliable body of information, consistent with other material, based on which a reasonable and ordinarily prudent person would have reason to believe that such an incident or pattern of conduct had occurred.

The commission is neither a judicial body, nor a prosecutor. It cannot make final determinations of individual responsibility for alleged violations of international humanitarian law and human rights law.

12. What casualty figures did the commission use in the report?

13. What will happen after the commission presents its report?

The commission will present its findings to the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva (Switzerland). The presentation of the report is scheduled for 29 June 2015, followed by a debate by member states and the adoption of a resolution. The commission of inquiry hopes that parties will seriously study the findings of its report and implement its recommendations.

14. To whom should media inquiries relating to the commission be directed?

Media enquiries should be directed to: Frances Harrison at or +41 798719824 and Rolando Gómez: +41 22 917 9711,

Follow UNISPAL RSS Twitter