Follow UNISPAL Twitter RSS
ON ITS THIRD SPECIAL SESSION
Vice-President and Rapporteur: Mr. Musa Burayzat (Jordan)
The Human Rights Council,
Affirming the applicability of the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949, to the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem,
Gravely concerned at the continued violation by the occupying Power, Israel, of the human rights of the Palestinian people in the Occupied Palestinian Territory,
Recognizing that the Israeli military incursions in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including the recent incursion in northern Gaza and the assault on Beit Hanoun, constitute a collective punishment of the civilians therein and exacerbate the severe humanitarian crisis in the Occupied Palestinian Territory,
Taking note of the sense of shock expressed by the Secretary-General on the Israeli military operations carried out in Beit Hanoun on 8 November 2006,
Emphasizing that the Israeli wilful killing of Palestinian civilians, including women and children, constitutes a gross violation of human rights law and international humanitarian law,
Affirming that, under international humanitarian law, the medical personnel and means of transport of the Palestine Red Crescent Society must be protected and respected in all circumstances,
1. Expresses its shock at the horror of Israeli killing of Palestinian civilians in Beit Hanoun while asleep and other civilians fleeing earlier Israeli bombardment;
2. Condemns the Israeli killing of Palestinian civilians, including women and children, as well as of medics in Beit Hanoun and other Palestinian towns and villages, and calls for bringing the perpetrators thereof to justice;
3. Denounces the Israeli massive destruction of Palestinian homes, property and infrastructure in Beit Hanoun;
4. Expresses its alarm at the gross and systematic violations of human rights of the Palestinian people in the Occupied Palestinian Territory by the occupying Power, Israel, and calls for urgent international action to put an immediate end to these violations, including those emanating from the series of incessant and repeated Israeli military incursions therein;
5. Calls for immediate protection of the Palestinian civilians in the Occupied Palestinian Territory in compliance with human rights law and international humanitarian law;
6. Urges all concerned parties to respect the rules of international humanitarian law, to refrain from violence against the civilian population and to treat under all circumstances all detained combatants and civilians in accordance with the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949;
7. Decides to dispatch urgently a high-level fact-finding mission, to be appointed by the President of the Human Rights Council, to travel to Beit Hanoun to, inter alia: (a) assess the situation of victims; (b) address the needs of survivors; and (c) make recommendations on ways and means to protect Palestinian civilians against any further Israeli assaults;
8. Requests the Secretary-General and the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to provide all administrative, technical and logistical assistance required to enable the fact-finding mission to fulfil its mandate promptly and efficiently;
9. Requests the fact-finding mission to report to the Council no later than the middle of December 2006 on progress made towards the fulfilment of its mandate.
10. The Council further accepted the recommendation that, with regard to statements in exercise of the right of reply, a limit of two statements per delegation for the entire session, three minutes for the first and two minutes for the second, would be observed.
15. At the same meeting, and at the 2nd meeting, on the same day, statements were made by the following:
(a) Representatives of States members of the Council: Algeria (also on behalf of the Group of African States), Bahrain (on behalf of the Group of Arab States), Bangladesh, Brazil (on behalf of Ecuador), Canada, China, Cuba (also on behalf of the States members of the United Nations who are members of the Non-Aligned Movement), Finland (on behalf of the European Union, acceding countries - Bulgaria and Romania, candidate countries - Croatia, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Turkey, countries in the process of stabilization and association and potential candidates - Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro and Serbia, the European Free Trade Association countries and members of the European Economic Area - Iceland and Liechtenstein, as well as the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine), India, Indonesia, Jordan, Malaysia, Mauritius, Morocco, Pakistan (on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference), Qatar, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Switzerland, Tunisia, Uruguay and Zambia;
(b ) Observers for concerned countries or parties: Israel and Palestine;
(c) Observers for non-member States: Australia, Belarus, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Egypt, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Kuwait, Lebanon, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Norway, Oman, Qatar, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, United States of America, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) and Yemen;
(d ) Observer for the Holy See;
(e) Observers for intergovernmental organizations: African Union and Organization of the Islamic Conference; and
(f ) Observers for non-governmental organizations: Amnesty International, B’nai B’rith International (on behalf of Coordinating Board of Jewish Organizations), Human Rights Watch, Indian Movement Tupaj Amaru (on behalf of World Peace Council), International Humanist and Ethical Union, International Organization for the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (on behalf of Arab Lawyers Union and Union of Arab Jurists), Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (on behalf of International Federation of Human Rights Leagues), United Nations Watch and World Union for Progressive Judaism.
16. At the 2nd meeting, on 15 November 2006, the representative of Pakistan (on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference and the Group of Arab States) introduced draft resolution A/HRC/S-3/L.1, sponsored by Algeria, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Brunei Darussalam * , Chad*, Cuba, Egypt*, Guinea * , Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of)*, Jordan, Kuwait*, Lebanon * , Libyan Arab Jamahiriya*, Malaysia, Mali, Morocco, Oman*, Pakistan, Palestine*, Qatar*, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, South Africa, Sudan*, Syrian Arab Republic*, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates*, United Republic of Tanzania*, Uzbekistan* and Yemen*. Afghanistan*, Belarus*, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea*, Iraq*, Mauritania*, Nigeria and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)* subsequently joined the sponsors.
17. At the same meeting, the representative of Pakistan (on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference and the Group of Arab States) orally revised the draft resolution as follows:
19. In accordance with rule 153 of the rules of procedure of the General Assembly, the attention of the Council was drawn to the estimated administrative and programme budget implications1of the draft resolution.
20. Statements in explanation of vote before the vote on the draft resolution, as orally revised, were made by the representatives of Ecuador, Finland (on behalf of the States members of the European Union that are members of the Council and acceding country, Romania), Guatemala and Mexico.
21. At the request of the representative of Canada, a recorded vote was taken on the draft resolution, as orally revised, which was adopted by 32 votes to 8, with 6 abstentions. The voting was as follows:
Against: Canada, Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Abstaining: France, Guatemala, Japan, Republic of Korea, Switzerland, Ukraine.
23. After the adoption of the resolution, as orally revised, a statement was made by the representative of Pakistan.
24. For the text of the resolution as adopted, see chapter I, resolution S-3/1.
Administrative and programme budget implications of the resolution
adopted by the Council at its third special session
Statement on programme budget implications (PBI)
(a) Decide to dispatch a high-level fact-finding mission urgently to Beit Hanoun to investigate human rights violations resulting from the recent Israeli assaults including the killings of civilians and destruction of property and infrastructure therein;
(b) R equest the Secretary-General and the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to provide all administrative, technical and logistical assistance required to enable the fact-finding mission to fulfil its mandate promptly and efficiently; and
(c) Request the fact-finding mission to report to the Council no later than the middle of December 2006 on progress made towards the fulfilment of its mandate.
2. The terms of the draft resolution require analysis and review of the level of resources required to implement the related activities. Owing to the one-day duration of the third special session of the Council, there is not sufficient time for the Secretariat to prepare and present a related statement of administrative and financial implications of the draft resolution. This oral statement is presented to inform the Council that the resources required to implement the draft resolution would, to the extent possible, be met from resources approved by the General Assembly under section 23, Human rights, for the programme budget in the biennium 2006-2007.
3. However, the Secretariat expects to carry out a thorough review of the implications of the draft resolution and, in accordance with established budgetary procedures, prepare a written statement containing a detailed analysis of the programme budget implications of the draft resolution which would be submitted to the General Assembly at the time it considers this resolution. It should be recalled that, under the procedures established by the General Assembly in its resolutions 41/213 and 42/211, a contingency fund is established for each biennium to accommodate additional expenditures derived from legislative mandates not provided for in the programme budget. Under this procedure, if additional expenditures are proposed that exceed the resources available from the contingency fund, the activities concerned can be implemented only through the redeployment of resources from low-priority areas or the modification of existing activities. Otherwise, such additional activities must be deferred to a later biennium.