Question of Palestine home || Permalink || About UNISPAL || Search

English (pdf) ||Arabic||Chinese||Français||Русский||Español||



Follow UNISPAL Twitter RSS

UNITED
NATIONS
A

        General Assembly
Distr.
GENERAL
A/HRC/S-1/3
18 July 2006

Original: ENGLISH

HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL
First special session
5-6 July 2006




REPORT ON THE FIRST SPECIAL SESSION

OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL

Vice-President and Rapporteur: Mr. Musa Burayzat (Jordan)



I. DRAFT DECISION RECOMMENDED TO THE
GENERAL ASSEMBLY FOR APPROVAL

The General Assembly, taking note of Human Rights Council resolution S-1/Res.1 of 6 July 2006, endorses the Council’s decision to dispatch an urgent fact-finding mission headed by the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967.

II. RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL

S-1/Res.1. Human rights situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory


The Human Rights Council ,

Guided by the principles and objectives of the Charter of the United Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenants on Human Rights,

Affirming the applicability of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civil Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949, to the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and to other occupied Arab territories,

Expressing deep concern at the breaches by Israel, the occupying Power, of international humanitarian law and human rights law in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including the arbitrary arrest of Palestinian ministers, members of the Palestinian Legislative Council and other officials, as well as the arbitrary arrest of other civilians, the military attacks against Palestinian ministries, including the office of the Premier, and the destruction of Palestinian infrastructure, including water networks, power plants and bridges,


2nd meeting
6 July 2006
[Adopted by a recorded vote of 29 to 11,
with 5 abstentions]

III. ORGANIZATION OF WORK OF THE SPECIAL SESSION

1. Pursuant to paragraph 10 of General Assembly resolution 60/251, of 15 March 2006, the Human Rights Council “shall be able to hold special sessions, when needed, at the request of a member of the Council with the support of one third of the membership of the Council”.

2. By a letter dated 30 June 2006, addressed to the President of the Human Rights Council, the Permanent Representative of Tunisia to the United Nations Office at Geneva, on behalf of the Group of Arab States, requested that a special session of the Council be convened immediately “to consider the latest escalation of the situation in the Palestinian and other occupied Arab territories” (see document A/HRC/S-1/1). The letter was received by the President, on the same day, following the closure of the first session of the Council.

3. The letter was accompanied by signatures in support of the above-mentioned request from the following 21 States members of the Council: Algeria; Azerbaijan; Bahrain; Bangladesh; Brazil; China; Cuba; Gabon; India; Indonesia; Jordan; Malaysia; Mali; Morocco; Pakistan; Russian Federation; Saudi Arabia; Senegal; South Africa; Sri Lanka; and Tunisia.

4. As more than one third of the membership supported the above-mentioned request, the President, following consultations with the Bureau, decided to convene a special session of the Council from 5 to 6 July 2006.

...

E. Resolution and documentation

11. Resolution S-1/Res.1, adopted by the Commission at its first special session, is reproduced in chapter II of the present report. A draft decision for approval by the General Assembly is set out in chapter I.

12. Annex I to the present report contains statement regarding the administrative and programme budget implications of resolution S-1/Res.1.

13. Annex II contains the list of documents issued for the special session.

F. Statements

14. At the 1st meeting, on 5 July 2006, the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, Mr. John Dugard, made a statement.

15. At the same meeting, statements were made by the following:

(a) Representatives of States members of the Council: Algeria (on behalf of the Group of African States); Azerbaijan; Bahrain; Bangladesh; Brazil; Canada; China; Cuba; Finland (on behalf of the European Union); France; India; Indonesia; Japan; Malaysia; Mali; Morocco; Pakistan (on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference); Russian Federation; Senegal; South Africa; Saudi Arabia; Switzerland; Tunisia (on behalf of the Group of Arab States); Uruguay; and Zambia;

(b) Representatives of concerned countries or parties: Israel; Lebanon; Palestine; and Syrian Arab Republic;

(c) Representatives of observer States of the Council: Australia; Chile; Colombia; Egypt; Iran (Islamic Republic of); Kuwait; Libyan Arab Jamahiriya; New Zealand; Nicaragua; Norway; Qatar; Sudan; United Arab Emirates; United States of America; and Yemen; and

(d) Observers for intergovernmental organizations: League of Arab States.

16. At the same meeting, the representative of Pakistan moved, under rule 117 of the rules of procedure of the General Assembly, to close the debate on the item under discussion in order to begin consideration of draft resolution A/HRC/S-1/L.1. The motion was accepted by the Council and the President subsequently declared the closure of the debate.

G. Action on draft resolution A/HRC/S-1/L.1
Human rights situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory

17. At the 1st meeting, on 5 July 2006, the representative of Pakistan (on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference) introduced draft resolution A/HRC/S-1/L.1, sponsored by Algeria, Bahrain, Cuba, Egypt * , Indonesia, Jordan, Lebanon* , Malaysia, Morocco, Pakistan (on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference), Saudi Arabia, Sudan *, Syrian Arab Republic* , Tunisia (on behalf of the Group of Arab States), and United Arab Emirates * . Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea* , Djibouti, Guinea*, Iran (Islamic Republic of) * , Iraq*, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya* , Mali, Senegal, and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)* subsequently joined the sponsors.

18. At the same meeting, the representative of Pakistan (on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference) orally revised the draft resolution by replacing operative paragraph 5 with the following: “Decides to dispatch an urgent fact-finding mission headed by the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967”.

19. At the same meeting, the representative of Switzerland orally amended the draft resolution by proposing the insertion of three new paragraphs following operative paragraph 4 to read as follows:

“New operative paragraph 4 bis: Urges all Palestinian armed groups to respect the rules of international humanitarian law;

“New operative paragraph 4 ter: Urges also all Palestinian armed groups to refrain from violence against the civilian population;

“New operative paragraph 4 quater: Urges those who detain the Israeli soldier to treat him humanely, in all circumstances, in conformity with the Geneva Conventions.”

20. At the 2nd meeting, on 6 July 2006, the representative of Switzerland withdrew the proposed insertion of new operative paragraph 4 quater.

21. At the same meeting, the representative of Pakistan (on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference) orally amended the amendment proposed by Switzerland by modifying new operative paragraphs 4 bis and ter to read as follows: “Urges all concerned parties to respect the rules of international humanitarian law, to refrain from violence against the civilian population and to treat under all circumstances all detained combatants and civilians in accordance with the Geneva Conventions”.

22. Statements in explanation of vote before the vote on the amendment proposed by Pakistan (on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference) were made by the representatives of Canada, Cuba, Finland (on behalf of the members of the European Union that are States members of the Council and Romania), and the Russian Federation.

23. At the request of the representative of Switzerland, a recorded vote was taken on the amendment proposed by Pakistan (on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference), which was adopted by 28 votes to 0, with 17 abstentions. The voting was as follows:

In favour: Algeria, Argentina, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Brazil, China, Cuba, Ecuador, Ghana, India, Indonesia, Jordan, Malaysia, Mali, Mauritius, Mexico, Morocco, Pakistan, Philippines, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Tunisia, Uruguay, Zambia.

Against: None

Abstaining: Cameroon, Canada, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Guatemala, Japan, Netherlands, Nigeria, Peru, Poland, Republic of Korea, Romania, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

24. At the same meeting, statements in connection with the draft resolution were made by the observers for Israel and Palestine.

25. In accordance with rule 153 of the rules of procedure of the General Assembly, the attention of the Council was drawn to the estimated administrative and programme budget implications 3 of the draft resolution.

26. Statements in explanation of vote before the vote were made by the representatives of Canada, China, Ecuador, Finland (on behalf of the members of the European Union that are States members of the Council and Romania), Guatemala, Peru, the Philippines and Switzerland.

27. At the request of the representative of Finland (on behalf of the members of the European Union that are States members of the Council and Romania), a recorded vote was taken on the draft resolution, as orally amended and revised, which was adopted by 29 votes to 11, with 5 abstentions. The voting was as follows:

In favour: Algeria, Argentina, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Brazil, China, Cuba, Ecuador, Ghana, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, Jordan, Malaysia, Mali, Mauritius, Morocco, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Tunisia, Uruguay, Zambia.

Against: Canada, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Ukraine, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Abstaining: Cameroon, Mexico, Nigeria, Republic of Korea, Switzerland.

28. Statements in explanation of vote after the vote were made by the representatives of Brazil (also on behalf of Argentina and Uruguay), Japan and Mexico.

29. After the adoption of the resolution, a statement was made by the representative of Pakistan (on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference).

30. For the text of the resolution as adopted, see chapter II, resolution S-1/Res.1.


ANNEX I

Administrative and programme budget implications of resolution S-1/Res.1.

PBI Statement


Annex II

List of documents issued for the first special session of the
Human Rights Council
Documents issued in the general series
Symbol
A/HRC/S-1/1 Letter dated 30 June 2006 from the Permanent Representative of Tunisia to the United Nations Office at Geneva, address to the President of the Human Rights Council
A/HRC/S-1/2 Contribution of the World Bank to the Special Session on the human rights situation in the Palestinian and other occupied Arab territories
Documents issued in the limited series
A/HRC/S-1/L.1 Human rights situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory: draft resolution
Documents issued in the non-governmental organizations series
A/HRC/S-1/NGO/1 Written statement submitted by amnesty International, a non-governmental organization in special consultative status
A/HRC/S-1/NGO/2 Written statement submitted by the World Vision (WVI), a non-governmental organization in general consultative status
A/HRC/S-1/NGO/3 Written statement submitted by United Nations Watch (UN Watch), a non-governmental organization in special consultative status
A/HRC/S-1/NGO/4 Joint written statement submitted by the Association for World Education and the World Union for Progressive Judaism (WUPJ), non-governmental organizations on the Roster
A/HRC/S-1/NGO/5 Written statement submitted by the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists (IAJLJ), a non-governmental organization in special consultative status
A/HRC/S-1/NGO/6 Joint written statement submitted by the International Youth and Student Movement for the United Nations (ISMUN), a non-governmental organization in general consultative status; and Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF) International League for the Rights and Liberation of Peoples (LIDLIP World Alliance of Young Men’s Christian Associations (YMCA) ,World Young Women’s Christian Association (World YWCA) , Tebtebba Foundation (Indigenous Peoples' International Centre for Policy Research and Education) and the Union of Arab Jurists, non-governmental organizations in special consultative status
A/HRC/S-1/NGO/7 Written statement submitted by Human Rights Watch (HRW), a non-governmental organization in special consultative status
A/HRC/S-1/NGO/8 Written statement submitted by the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ), a non-governmental organization in special consultative status


- - - - -


Follow UNISPAL RSS Twitter