Question of Palestine home
||
Permalink
||
About UNISPAL
||
Search
English (pdf)
||
Arabic
||
Chinese
||
Français||
Русский
||
Español
||
Follow UNISPAL
Twitter
RSS
UNITED
NATIONS
A
General Assembly
A/48/275
6 August 1993
General Assembly
Forty-eighth session
Item 85 of the provisional agenda*
UNITED NATIONS RELIEF AND WORKS AGENCY FOR PALESTINE REFUGEES
IN THE NEAR EAST
Revenues derived from Palestine refugees' properties
Report of the Secretary-General
1. The present report is submitted in pursuance of General Assembly resolution 47/69 H of 14 December 1992, entitled "Revenues derived from Palestine refugees' properties", the operative paragraphs of which read as follows:
"
The General Assembly
"...
"1.
Requests
the Secretary-General to take all appropriate steps, in consultation with the United Nations Conciliation Commission for Palestine, for the protection and administration of Arab property, assets and property rights in Israel and to establish a fund for the receipt of income derived therefrom, on behalf of the rightful owners;
"2.
Calls once more upon
Israel to render all facilities and assistance to the Secretary-General in the implementation of the present resolution;
"3.
Calls upon
the Governments of all the other Member States concerned to provide the Secretary-General with any pertinent information in their possession concerning Arab property, assets and property rights in Israel, which would assist the Secretary-General in the implementation of the present resolution;
"4.
Deplores
the refusal of Israel to cooperate with the Secretary-General in the implementation of the resolutions on the question;
"5.
Requests
the Secretary-General to report to the General Assembly at its forty-eighth session on the implementation of the present resolution."
2. On 18 February 1993, in accordance with established procedure, the relevant provisions of General Assembly resolutions 47/69 A to K were brought to the attention of the Chairman of the United Nations Conciliation Commission for Palestine.
3. On the same date, the Secretary-General transmitted to the Government of Israel those resolutions, including resolution 47/69 H, and requested Israel to inform him by 30 June 1993 of any steps it had taken or envisaged taking in implementation of the relevant provisions of those resolutions.
4. Also on the same date, the Secretary-General sent a note verbale to all other Member States, drawing their attention to the relevant provisions of resolutions 47/69 A to K, including paragraph 3 of resolution 47/69 H, and requesting information by 30 June 1993 concerning any action taken or envisaged in relation to their implementation.
5. A reply dated 15 June 1993 was received from Israel, covering various aspects of resolutions 47/69 A to K. In the portion of the reply relating to resolution 47/69 H, the text read as follows:
"Resolution 47/69 H demonstrates its sponsors' misuse of the General Assembly for the goals of the ongoing propaganda campaign against Israel. Israel's position on this resolution has been set out in statements by Israel's representative to the Special Political Committee on 10 November 1981 (A/SPC/36/SR.28), on 15 November 1985 (A/SPC/40/SR.34), on 28 October 1986 (A/SPC/41/SR.14) and in the report of the Secretary-General (A/47/438).
"There is no legal basis for taking the steps proposed by this resolution. Property rights within the borders of a sovereign State are exclusively subject to the domestic laws of that State. The right of States to regulate and dispose of property within their territory (and the income derived from that property) is a generally accepted principle.
"Significantly, the sponsors of this resolution have not suggested at any time that similar steps be taken regarding the confiscated Jewish property in Arab countries. As a result of the 1948 war, approximately 800,000 Jewish refugees from Arab countries were resettled in Israel. The property left behind by these Jewish refugees (estimated to be worth billions of dollars) was expropriated by the Governments of the Arab countries in which they lived. There can be no difference in law, justice or equity between the claims of Arab and Jewish property owners. By doing so, the sponsors of resolution 47/69 H are suggesting that Israel's sovereignty is limited or restricted by some provision that does not apply to other States Members of the United Nations."
6. At the time of preparation of this report, no reply had been received from any other Member State in relation to the implementation of resolution 47/69 H.
-----
Follow UNISPAL
RSS
Twitter