Question of Palestine home || Permalink || About UNISPAL || Search

English (pdf) ||Arabic||Chinese||Français||Русский||Español||



Follow UNISPAL Twitter RSS

UNITED
NATIONS
A

        General Assembly
Distr.
GENERAL
A/45/464
11 September 1990

ORIGINAL: ENGLISH

Forty-fifth session
Item 76 of the provisional agenda*


UNITED NATIONS RELIEF AND WORKS AGENCY FOR
PALESTINE REFUGEES IN THE NEAR EAST

Palestine refugees in the Palestinian territory
occupied by Israel since 1967

Report of the Secretary-General


1. The present report is submitted to the General Assembly in pursuance of its resolution 44/47 E of 8 December 1989, the operative paragraphs of which read as follows:

2. On 28 February 1990, the Secretary-General addressed a note verbale to the Permanent Representative of Israel to the United Nations, in which he drew attention to his reporting responsibility under the resolution and requested the Permanent Representative to inform him of any steps his Government had taken or envisaged taking in implementation of the relevant provisions of the resolution.

3. In a note verbale dated 29 June 1990, the Permanent Representative of Israel replied as follows:
4. The following information concerning Israel's compliance with General Assembly resolution 44/47 E is based on reports from the Commissioner-General of UNRWA.

5. In the Gaza Strip as well as the West Bank, refugee shelters have been demolished and sealed on punitive grounds by the Israeli authorities. The matter is dealt with in detail in the Commissioner-General's annual report to the General Assembly. 1/

6. The Agency is following up with the Israeli authorities the rehousing of refugees who remain affected by the demolitions in 1971 in the Gaza Strip. Paragraph 6 of last year's report (A/44/608) referred to the status of 87 families categorized as living in hardship conditions. The situation on 30 June 1990 remains the same: of these 87 families, 13 continue to live in conditions of hardship, 19 remain unsatisfactorily housed, 37 are satisfactorily housed, and 18 had previously purchased houses in projects sponsored by the Israeli authorities. The situation of the 13 families living in conditions of hardship has been checked several times during the reporting period. Despite repeated assurances by the Israeli authorities that they will be rehoused very little progress has been made. The authorities has assured the Agency that a solution has been developed and would be implemented as soon as possible.

7. During the reporting period, the Commissioner-General obtained the following information relating to refugee shelters demolished by the Israeli authorities in the Gaza Strip on the grounds that they had been built without proper authority on State land outside camp boundaries:

(a) In paragraph 7 (a) of last year's report (A/44/608), it was stated that the Israeli authorities told several families living on the northern perimeter of the Jabalia Camp to remove some of their shelter extensions and that these families had taken the matter to the High Court of Israel, which had ruled against them. No demolitions have taken place so far, although the shelters have been isolated by bulldozing of sand around their premises. The Israeli authorities are understood to have had discussions with some members of this group;

(b) Of the 35 families whose shelters on the perimeter of Beach Camp were demolished in 1983 (see A/41/564, para. 7 (b)), 18 families have received plots of land at Sheikh Radwan or the Beit Lahiya housing projects. One family bought a vacant shelter in Beach camp; three families have moved in with relatives in Jabalia Camp. One family has moved has moved in temporarily with a relative in Beach camp; two families have moved in with relatives living on the site of the demolished shelters. The remaining 10 families are living in temporary shelters built by themselves on or near the same site. One family out of these 13 special hardship cases has moved to Jabalia Camp to live with a son. The Israeli authorities have stated that they would be willing to consider allocating land in a housing project for the families who have not been rehoused, but that it would not be at Sheikh Radwan which is the project nearest the site.

(c) Four privately-built rooms located beyond the perimeter of Rafah Camp were demolished.

8. Paragraph 8 of last year's report (A/44/608) referred to some refugee families in Block Q at the Rafah Camp in the Gaza Strip who, at the instance of the Israeli authorities, has agreed to relocated to the Tel-es-Sultan housing project. As at 30 June 1990, 45 families had moved to Tel-es-Sultan. Some families, however, still remain in their shelters, of which 13 are isolated by sand ramparts.

9. During the reporting period, no new plots of land in housing projects in the Gaza Strip were allocated by the Israeli authorities for refugees living in camps. No new movements took place from camps to housing. Thirty-two plots of land have been allocated to families who were chosen to be the first families to return from the so-called Canada Camp, Rafah - Sinai, and to be settled in the Tel-es-Sultan. In addition, 31 refugee families comprising 151 persons have returned from the so-called Canada Camp to the Gaza Strip. Accommodation was provided by their relatives.

10. The Israeli authorities, according to information available to the Commissioner-General, have to date allocated approximately 3,914 plots of land in the Gaza Strip for housing projects. A total of 2,605 plots have been built on by 3,714 refugee families comprising 22,946 persons; buildings on 236 plots are under construction, 936 plots are still vacant and 137 have been built on by non-refugee families. In addition, 3,034 refugee families, consisting of 18,823 persons, have moved into 2,666 completed housing units consisting of 5,893 rooms.

11. Refugee families are continuing to purchase plots of land at subsidized rates for the construction of houses in the projects developed by the Israeli authorities in the Beit Lahiya, Nazleh and Tel-es-Sultan areas. The construction of multi-storey apartment blocks in Sheikh Radwan, sponsored by the Israeli authorities and offered for sale upon completion, as reported last year (A/44/608, para. 12), continues, but the process has slowed down considerably due to the prevailing situation.

12. With regard to the request addressed to the Commissioner-General in paragraph 2 of resolution 44/47 E, the Commissioner-General advises that since 1988 and in addition to its normal services, the Agency has been providing emergency food, medical and other assistance to those in need in the occupied territory. The Agency has also begun a longer-term programme to upgrade infrastructure, especially in the camps, and to improve economic and social conditions. These programmes are discussed in detail in the recent reports of the Commissioner-General. 2/

13. The Secretary-General regrets that he is unable at present to comply with the request addressed to him in paragraph 3 of the resolution. Under an arrangement that has been followed for 40 years, all refugee families registered with UNRWA are in possession of registration cards issued by the Agency. While these cards indicate the number of family members and whether they are eligible for services, they are not identification cards and have a much more limited purpose. The Commissioner-General of UNRWA has pointed out that the Agency issues a registration card reflecting data about the refugee family concerned, which is entered on the registration roll at the time of registration. While the need for documentation, such as is required in the resolution, is appreciated, the Commissioner-General does not have the means to issue identity cards as such. He will, however, keep the situation under review to see whether appropriate documentation regarding the registration status of individual members of refugee families could be issued.


________________

Notes

1/ Official Records of the General Assembly, Forty-fifth session, Supplement No. 13 (A/45/13), chap. VII, sect. B.

2/ Official Records of the General Assembly, Forty-third session, Supplement No. 13 (A/43/13), chap. II, sect. B; ibid., Forty-fourth Session, Supplement No. 13 (A/44/13), chap. VI, sects. C and D; ibid., Forty-fifth session, Supplement No. 13 (A/45/13), chap. VI, sects. C and D.


Follow UNISPAL RSS Twitter